The War Powers Act Must Be Revised

The War Powers Act of 1973, also known as the War Powers Resolution, was passed by Congress to reassert its constitutional authority over matters of war. Lawmakers were driven to action by a growing frustration with presidential power that had come to a head during the Vietnam War and the secret bombings of Cambodia.

The Vietnam War was an undeclared war and became a deeply divisive conflict, costing over 58,000 American lives and more than $200 billion. Crucially, it was an undeclared war and the last actual war declared constitutionally by Congress was World War II – not even the Korean War. Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution in 1964 to authorize force, but it NEVER issued a formal declaration of war, leading many to believe the executive branch had overstepped its bounds.

The conflict became a powerful symbol of an “imperial presidency,” where the executive branch was seen as amassing too much power and bypassing Congress on decisions of war and peace. What has really taken place and why I and opposed to granting Trump any power to engage in war with Iran is that not only does the Constitution delegate the power to engage in war to Congress exclusively, the Neocons have been manipulating US foreign policy by infiltrated the presidency no matter who is there to engage in their endless wars using this “immediate threat” nonsense to justify circumventing the Constitution are thereby the people of the United States for their personal agendas. They have infiltrated every President’s Administration and this to me is treason. This is now in plain view when Netanyahu was there in the Situation Room making his presentation to get the United States to fight his personal war against Iran.

The final catalyst for the War Powers Act was a direct challenge to congressional authority by President Richard Nixon. In March 1969, President Nixon began secretly bombing Cambodia, a neutral country, in an operation code-named “Menu.”  The bombings were kept entirely secret from Congress and the American public for over a year. When the invasion of Cambodia by ground troops was announced in 1970, it was seen as a president who had “abused his powers by side-stepping Congress.”

The Act explicitly forbids the President from keeping troops in combat for more than 60 days without Congress’s explicit approval, a direct attempt to prevent future lengthy, undeclared conflicts like Vietnam.

Neocons don’t have a special backdoor in the War Powers Resolution. Instead, they are the most prominent advocates for a broad interpretation of a loophole that any president can use: claiming an “imminent threat” to justify military action without prior congressional approval.

Here is how the legal mechanism works and why neoconservatives champion it.

The Legal Mechanism that the Neocon exploit is the “Imminent Threat” Loophole. The War Powers Resolution of 1973 was designed to check presidential power, but it includes a critical exception for emergencies and therein lies the problem. The act’s core purpose is to ensure the “collective judgment” of both the executive and legislative branches before sending troops into harm’s way. However, it explicitly carves out an exception for situations where the U.S. is responding to:

“attacks or the imminent threat of attacks upon the United States.”

The Neocons just lie as they always do. Saddam had weapons on mass destruction which was a imminent threat. With Iran, the claim was they were building a nuke and had missile capacity to possibly attack the United States. This was imminent Neocon fiction to circumvent Congress.

This language creates the loophole that the Neocons exploit to circumvent Congress. A president can argue that a situation is so urgent that there is no time to consult Congress before acting. Once military action is taken, the 60-day clock for congressional authorization starts ticking. However, Congress is then hostage to the very action as we are witnessing right now.

The Neocon rationale for endless wars boils down to how they view this loophole not as an exception, but as a fundamental expression of presidential power.

The “Unitary Executive” Theory: Neoconservatives are strong proponents of the “unitary executive” theory, which argues the President has virtually unlimited power as Commander-in-Chief to initiate military action without congressional interference. They see any limitation, like the War Powers Resolution, as an unconstitutional infringement on the executive’s authority to defend the nation.

We need to close this loophole where the Executive must present the imminent threat to the Congress Armed Services Committee, and it must be a UNANIMOUS VOTE backed by hard evidence. Colin Powell was lied to by the Neocons and Netanyahu that there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He placed the blame on the system, stating that the speech “was a great intelligence failure,” as the CIA and other agencies provided him with information that turned out to be completely false. If anyone does this again and knowingly provides false information, that should be life without parole.

The Neocons have been abusing this power for their own agenda. That is why we had Dick Cheney, may he rot in hell, endorse Kamala just so he could create his dream of conquering 7 countries in the Middle East. It is time that this loophole is closed permanently. We clearly do not live in the faintest imitation of a DEMOCRACY – this is an oligarchy when these Neocons can create war for personal gain, circumventing Congress and sending people to go die as they line their pockets.

Treason in the U.S. Constitution is defined as levying war against the United States or adhering to its enemies by giving them aid and comfort. A person cannot be convicted of treason unless there are two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court.

Granted, an individual lying to manipulate U.S. foreign policy and start a war for personal reasons would likely not meet the constitutional definition of treason. However, it would constitute several other serious federal crimes, particularly those involving false statements to Congress, perjury, or fraud. The U.S. Constitution narrowly defines treason, and while the hypothetical act is egregious, it probably wouldn’t satisfy that high bar.

The New York Times’s reporting about what led President Trump to join Netanyahu in attacking Iran. The story opens with Netanyahu’s visit to the White House on Feb. 11. The prime minister “was whisked inside with little ceremony, out of view of reporters, primed for one of the most high-stakes moments in his long career.” We should know who in the White House arranged this presentation, and we should see now what Netanyahu prepared to sell this war, usurping American foreign policy.

The Times described Netanyahu entering a “highly classified presentation” with Trump and other White House officials, and that the Situation Room was “rarely used for in-person meetings with foreign leaders.” The two leaders sat across from each other, instead of Trump sitting at the head of the table. Why did nobody in that room advise Trump of the risks to the Strait of Hormuz and the global economy?

Thanks to Netanyahu’s assassination tactics, Iran developed a completely new layered structure, knowing he stupidly thinks killing the leader will bring down the government. In the aftermath of the June 2025 12-day war, the Iranians developed a plan to hit their neighbors and threaten global energy supplies. That was so obvious; it is beyond belief that no one was there advising Trump on what took place. Over the past five weeks, the Emiratis have been hit more times than Israel, with the Iranians training their fire on energy infrastructure and the UAE tech sector. Dubai was the new financial capital of the region, thanks to Switzerland’s stupidity in confiscating Russian individuals’ assets, proving they are no longer to be trusted, so capital fled to Dubai and Singapore.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps battered Bahrain’s energy and data centers, Kuwait’s oil facilities were targeted, and Qatar’s important Ras Laffan installation has been heavily damaged. Saudi Arabia’s pipelines and refineries have also been regular Iranian targets. The Iranians have fired thousands of missiles and drones at the Gulf States, knowing that they cannot go toe-to-toe with the USA, but they can bring down the world economy upon Trump and Netanyahu.

The Republicans blocked the Democrats’ motion on the War Powers Act, playing party politics.  We have to step back and look at how the Neocons are manipulating American Foreign Policy, circumventing the Constitution for their unelected agendas. I rarely agree with the Democrats, who have gone insane with their Woke Agenda. However, we seriously need to revise the War Powers Act and limit any pretend immediate threat to an actual attack, and not lies from Neocons of Weapons of Mass Destruction that never existed, and nobody ever pays the price for such lies.