How retirees should respond to the Iran crisis

While the U.S. may yet attract some second-tier allies, thus far Trump seems to be isolated and forced to “go it alone,” perhaps a karmic response from the allies he spurned with his tariffs and global trade war.  

For a comprehensive look at recommendations by 14 investment advisors and business owners in the U.S., see the recent blog on my site, coordinated by Featured.com on LinkedIn. In the more limited space available for this column, I have added Canadian input from four well-known domestic financial pros. 

Don’t let geopolitics torpedo your plan

Typical of the Featured.com blog is this comment from an advisor who warned against making major asset allocation shifts because of geopolitical events like Iran: “Large structural shifts are rarely advisable for retirement investors because they can introduce timing risk,” said Dennis Shirshikov, head of growth and engineering, Growthlimit.com. 

“A more disciplined approach is to review whether the portfolio already includes defensive characteristics such as income-producing assets, diversified sectors, and a stable allocation to fixed income. When those foundations are in place, geopolitical events tend to have less influence on long-term outcomes. Investors often benefit more from maintaining diversification and liquidity than from attempting to reposition aggressively during uncertain moments.”

Or as another source succinctly put it, “For most retirees, this is more of a rebalance-and-defend moment than a reason to overhaul the portfolio.” Lastly, investment banker Oliver Bogner of the Advisory Investment Bank describes his major defensive move as “a barbell: keep quality equity exposure, but pair it with explicit ‘shock absorbers’ that don’t pretend to predict the war.”

His exchange-traded fund (ETF) picks include “GLD [invested in gold bullion] as an insurance sleeve for energy/war risk and XLU [utilities] for the boring cash-flow tilt; I size them small enough that they help in stress but don’t hijack the whole portfolio.”  

What Canadian advisors say

Moving on to a more Canadian perspective provided by local experts, former advisor and blogger Dale Roberts recently penned this excellent blog on the spectre of stagflation, which is an insidious combination of diminished growth coupled with rising inflation. Among his many suggestions, the most valuable may be his emphasis on maintaining an “all-weather portfolio” catering to all four possible economic quadrants: inflationary growth, disinflationary growth, stagflation, and deflation/recession.

Certified Financial Planner John de Goey, portfolio manager with Toronto-based Designed Securities, was increasingly bearish well before the Iran war. “I absolutely think the world has changed,” De Goey told me in an email exchange. “Not only has the rule of law given way to brazen self-interest (both military and economic), but that shift has caused what the prime minister [Mark Carney] referred to as a rupture.”

In short, De Goey believes, “it would be foolish to proceed as though nothing has materially changed.” De Goey says “Operation Epstein Fury” appears to have failed in its mission, “if it ever had one to begin with.” Israel goaded the U.S. into an avoidable war with no obvious objective or end. As a result, “energy inflation will lead to general inflation, economic stagnation… and a major global recession.” He concurs with Roberts that the “stagflation of the 1970s seems set to return.” Nor does he rule out a possible depression, given how high stock valuations still are. By most reasonable standards “the economy is in worse shape now than the last time stagflation reared its head.”

De Goey notes the S&P CAPE ratio is at 38 now, the Buffett Indicator is nearly 220 and accumulated American debt is more than US$39 trillion. On top of global market chaos, Canada also has to deal with the CUSMA trade negotiations and that treaty’s possible abrogation. “Starting with the ‘Liberation Day’ tariffs and continuing into 2026, trade alliances have splintered, and new ones need to be built at lightning speed to make up the shortfall. Times will be harder.”

De Goey suggests retirees and near-retirees can consider reducing exposure to traditional financial assets (especially U.S. stocks and bonds); take a more defensive approach to strategic asset allocation; consider moving to more pension-styled approaches to portfolio construction; and use more inflation-friendly assets (gold, materials, infrastructure—perhaps 10% in each). He also would explore uncommon but uncorrelated assets in growing industries or those with moats around them, such as clean energy and music royalties.

War’s duration unknowable

The unanswerable question is how long the Iran conflict may drag on, says Matthew Ardrey, senior financial planner with Toronto-based TriDelta Private Wealth. That in turn affects how portfolios need to be managed: “If it is just a few weeks or a couple of months, things could right themselves with little long-term effects to the economy. If it starts to drag on for months, or even worse longer, then the impact will be felt in the broader economy.”

Car owners already see higher prices at the pumps, and over the longer term rising transportation costs will affect the prices of all goods, including food. Since oil is used in the manufacturing of many products, there’s a “real risk of inflation.”

Investors still in the accumulation phase may view Iran pullbacks as proverbial buying opportunities. If so, Ardrey suggests adding to large, solid companies “designed to weather the storm. The lower the markets go, the better the opportunity for you to buy and make stronger returns in the long term.”

The situation is trickier for older investors living off assets. “My hope is they don’t need to be making large changes to their asset allocation or underlying investments because their portfolio was set up correctly in the first place. If not, there is still time to make changes,” Ardrey says.

Despite negative performance the last month, most investors should still have positive returns generated by strong markets in recent years: “This will allow them to make changes without taking permanent portfolio losses.” Indeed, the five-day reprieve Trump gave Iran the morning of March 23 may have been just such a rebalancing opportunity. This is another instance of the “TACO trade” coined by Wall Street: Trump Always Chickens Out. That means buying when Trump crashes markets, and selling after he reverses course and stocks bounce back. (Until he doesn’t TACO. How lucky do you feel?)