No Result
View All Result
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLES
  • Login
Thursday, October 30, 2025
TheAdviserMagazine.com
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
No Result
View All Result
TheAdviserMagazine.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Market Research Economy

The Purpose of Production and the Economy: A Criticism of Pronatalist Economics

by TheAdviserMagazine
4 months ago
in Economy
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
The Purpose of Production and the Economy: A Criticism of Pronatalist Economics
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LInkedIn


One of the main draws of the Austrian School of economics, at least for me, is that all its insights are grounded in real happenings; the school’s entire body of economic literature is meant to explain tangible things that actually happen. Whereas other schools of economics focus on some ethereal monolith known as “the economy”—a mystical being whose forces and wiles can only be divined through Cartesian coordinate planes—the Austrians study the discrete actions taken by living people that form the economy.

Many academics, policymakers, and commentators find the Austrian focus on mundane real-world events to be confusing at best and useless at worst, but they are mistaken. Many non-Austrians—having detached themselves from real-world events—often do not comprehend why man acts the way he does. This is illustrated most clearly by the increasingly popular pronatalist movement. Many pronatalists struggle with questions regarding the purpose of production and economic activity, and this is most clearly exemplified in the writings of the prominent pronatalist Lyman Stone, the “senior fellow and director of the Pronatalism Initiative at the Institute of Family Studies.”

The Pronatalist Economic Argument and its Flaws

While there are many different factions of pronatalists, there are only a few prominent arguments, and for the purposes of this article, only the economic arguments matter. Lyman Stone summarizes the pronatalist economic argument well: if there are fewer people in the future, then there will be less demand for goods, causing asset prices—and everyone’s savings—to decline. In the wider economy, this downward spiral would be bad for firms, government revenues, social services, and economic growth. As the population and economy decline, markets will shrink, leading to increased monopoly power and increasing importance of intergenerational inheritance. The increasing inter-generational primacy of inheritance is bad—according to Lyman Stone—since it leads to decreased social mobility. To cap off Lyman Stone’s apocalyptic prognostications, even immigration cannot be relied upon to supply the number of bodies needed to sustain the economy. These arguments are not unique to Lyman Stone and are generally representative of utilitarian pronatalist economic arguments, as seen in a 2023 article by “former” CIA analyst Martin Gurri.

Before getting to the deeper issue, there are a few basic economic fallacies which must be refuted here. Specifically, is it necessary for the wellbeing of everyone in the economy that prices and demand be constantly increasing?

We can think about this using a hypothetical free market economy that is also experiencing a declining population due to birth rates below replacement level. Rather than seeing a downward spiral of price deflation leading to an economic shutdown, what we would see is that entrepreneurs and consumers would adjust to the declining population through normal market activity. Entrepreneurs would still act to provide for the future demands of consumers. Innovators would still try to commercialize new ideas and inventions, leading to industry disruptions and spurring economic development. Consumers would still accept or reject the products offered to them by entrepreneurs, meaning that some entrepreneurs would succeed while others would fail and go out of business. The production of goods for consumers would still occur.

The only changes brought about by a falling population are that the amount of people producing, demanding, and forecasting the future is decreasing and that entrepreneurs will attempt to take this into account. Notably, this does not necessarily entail a decline in material production, though it could also happen. After all, there is no reason to conclude that just because the population has decreased necessarily means that humans are now unable to prosper by procuring more means to satisfy their ends.

In fact, prosperity is indicated by a decreasing price level of goods that people desire due to increased procurement. The real prices of agricultural products and electricity—two widely-demanded types of goods—have plummeted over the last century. The industrial revolution—largely brought about by deregulating industry to a degree never before seen in history—led to the production of so much food and electricity that the average American now has more to fear from overeating and electrical accidents than from starvation and environmental hostility.

If, in our real-world, regulated economy, the price of a good perpetually increased, one would be justified in suspecting that something was wrong. If continual abundance is evidenced by more affordable (declining) prices, then perpetually increasing prices of wanted goods demonstrates that economic development is being hindered and undone.

We can see now that Lyman Stone’s understanding of economic development is flawed, if not backwards. Perpetually increasing home prices are not natural and do not indicate positive economic development. The economy is not naturally based around the assumption that one’s property will perpetually increase in price, allowing the property-holder to rest assured that their future is secure. One also cannot say that everyone is worse off because there are fewer people to demand goods, nor that monopolization—more of a legal phenomenon than economic—is caused by declining populations; uncertainty is still present in entrepreneurial action regardless of the population’s increase or decrease. Finally, if government social schemes are arranged in such a way as to require a constantly increasing population to avoid failure, then these schemes are grossly detective and should be revised or (ideally) abolished.

The Purpose of the Economy

So far, we have managed to refute common economic arguments in favor of interventionism and price inflationism by thinking through a hypothetical free market economy with a declining population. The focus on action has allowed us to unveil several fallacies about wellbeing and economic growth. But, if we investigate the purpose of actions, and therefore the economy, we can see the greatest point of divergence between Lyman Stone’s pronatalism and economic science.

Man acts to satisfy felt unease, and more specifically, man consumes to satisfy felt unease. This should not be confused with the modern pejorative of “consumerism.” Instead, there is no way to satisfy felt unease—be it in the present or future—without consuming some resource or by devoting scarce energy to leisure. In order to consume, man produces goods. To produce more goods or to spend more time in leisure, man saves his resources to create capital, which is meant to produce more goods for consumption. Man also employs more labor and divides the tasks of production, specializing according to ability. If there was no satisfaction of felt unease through the consumption of goods or enjoyment of leisure in the present or the future, there would be no reason to produce, employ labor, specialize, or save to begin with.

By contrast, Lyman Stone’s view of the economy seems to be one in which production is the end and not the means. According to Lyman Stone, the fact that people value their “interior lives” and “idle hobbies” has caused people to have fewer children, making such valuations economically suboptimal. Rather, they should be foregoing needless activities such as hobbies, working out, sleeping, and showering daily to produce “things of value such as companies or children.” While Lyman Stone’s antipathy towards interior life springs from his radically empiricist beliefs (since the existence of an interior life confounds his own observations), he has rhetorically cornered himself and is unable to explain why people produce “things of value” in the first place. He attempts to solve this by declaring that producing things of “genuine value” for other people is licit. However, hobbies of “purely private enjoyment” are bad, “the optimal number of which is zero.” Carrying this line of thought to its conclusion, leisure should not exist, and the GDP should be maximized (by production and rarely, if ever, consumption). But why? What is the purpose of production if there should not be consumption? What is the purpose of the economy?

With these elaborations, we can finally understand why technocrats like Lyman Stone support pronatalism. Beyond the appeals to personal happiness—which appear to be mere rhetorical facades rather than genuine concern—the draw to pronatalism is clearly born out of faulty economic reasoning. To draw from the beginning of this article, Lyman Stone’s pronatalism understands “the economy” to be some creature that needs a growing supply of people to grow and bestow benefits upon us, lest the statistics start to trend downward. There is no consideration for why man produces. There is no concept of discrete actions, no idea that the economy is the result of actions. There are only trend lines and aggregate statistics.

Beyond faulty economic reasoning, I cannot think of a colder, grosser argument for people to have children. This is not a movement that really loves families and children; rather, it is a movement of regime-friendly technocrats who want more cogs for their machine. They may be “pronatal,” but they are most certainly not pro-human.



Source link

Tags: CriticismEconomicseconomyproductionPronatalistPurpose
ShareTweetShare
Previous Post

AI, Niches, and Reclaiming Your Freedom with Reza Hooda

Next Post

Israeli ophthalmic surgery co ForSight Robotics raises $125m

Related Posts

edit post
Xi strikes conciliatory tone as he meets Trump in South Korea

Xi strikes conciliatory tone as he meets Trump in South Korea

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 29, 2025
0

BUSAN, SOUTH KOREA - OCTOBER 30: U.S. President Donald Trump greets Chinese President Xi Jinping ahead of a bilateral meeting...

edit post
Ice Barbie Kristi Noem on the Bleeding Edge of Trump Era Conflict

Ice Barbie Kristi Noem on the Bleeding Edge of Trump Era Conflict

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 29, 2025
0

The MSM calls her ICE Barbie, but Kristi Noem, and the sprawling empire she rules as Secretary of the Department...

edit post
How Food Industry Lobbyists Keep the Food-Stamp Gravy Train Going

How Food Industry Lobbyists Keep the Food-Stamp Gravy Train Going

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 29, 2025
0

Unless members of Congress intervene to prevent it, the food stamp program—also known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—will be...

edit post
From NEOM to AI and tourism, Saudi Arabia’s priorities are shifting

From NEOM to AI and tourism, Saudi Arabia’s priorities are shifting

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 29, 2025
0

Digital render of NEOM's The Line project in Saudi ArabiaThe Line, NEOMWhen Saudi Arabia first announced plans to reinvent its...

edit post
The Trump Administration Is Lying Us Into Another War

The Trump Administration Is Lying Us Into Another War

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 29, 2025
0

Last week, President Trump ordered an aircraft carrier strike group into the waters off Venezuela. The deployment of the USS...

edit post
How Tariffs Hurt the Ones You Love

How Tariffs Hurt the Ones You Love

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 29, 2025
0

Yves here. Props to the VoxEU authors for a clever headline as well as an informative post. First, they’ve done...

Next Post
edit post
Israeli ophthalmic surgery co ForSight Robotics raises 5m

Israeli ophthalmic surgery co ForSight Robotics raises $125m

edit post
Breakout Stocks: How to trade MCX, BEL & Bharti Airtel that hit a fresh 52-week high? – Market Summary

Breakout Stocks: How to trade MCX, BEL & Bharti Airtel that hit a fresh 52-week high? - Market Summary

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
edit post
77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

October 18, 2025
edit post
Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

October 7, 2025
edit post
What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

October 8, 2025
edit post
Another Violent Outburst – Democrats Inciting Civil Unrest

Another Violent Outburst – Democrats Inciting Civil Unrest

October 24, 2025
edit post
Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

October 17, 2025
edit post
California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In 2M Ponzi Scheme

California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In $912M Ponzi Scheme

October 15, 2025
edit post
Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon

Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon

0
edit post
Here’s The Real Reason She Wants A Prenup

Here’s The Real Reason She Wants A Prenup

0
edit post
Guardant Health raises 2025 revenue outlook to 0M with Shield partnerships and strong oncology growth (NASDAQ:GH)

Guardant Health raises 2025 revenue outlook to $970M with Shield partnerships and strong oncology growth (NASDAQ:GH)

0
edit post
CMG Earnings: Highlights of Chipotle Mexican Grill’s Q3 2025 results

CMG Earnings: Highlights of Chipotle Mexican Grill’s Q3 2025 results

0
edit post
Top Sale Items You Can Donate to Your Local Food Bank

Top Sale Items You Can Donate to Your Local Food Bank

0
edit post
India’s Snabbit valuation doubled to 0M in 5 months on its quick house-help bet

India’s Snabbit valuation doubled to $180M in 5 months on its quick house-help bet

0
edit post
Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon

Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon

October 30, 2025
edit post
Guardant Health raises 2025 revenue outlook to 0M with Shield partnerships and strong oncology growth (NASDAQ:GH)

Guardant Health raises 2025 revenue outlook to $970M with Shield partnerships and strong oncology growth (NASDAQ:GH)

October 30, 2025
edit post
Bitcoin, Ethereum dip after Fed chair hints that 25-point rate cut may be last of 2025

Bitcoin, Ethereum dip after Fed chair hints that 25-point rate cut may be last of 2025

October 30, 2025
edit post
Xi strikes conciliatory tone as he meets Trump in South Korea

Xi strikes conciliatory tone as he meets Trump in South Korea

October 29, 2025
edit post
Groww announces IPO dates as regulatory uncertainty looms over stock brokers

Groww announces IPO dates as regulatory uncertainty looms over stock brokers

October 29, 2025
edit post
India’s Snabbit valuation doubled to 0M in 5 months on its quick house-help bet

India’s Snabbit valuation doubled to $180M in 5 months on its quick house-help bet

October 29, 2025
The Adviser Magazine

The first and only national digital and print magazine that connects individuals, families, and businesses to Fee-Only financial advisers, accountants, attorneys and college guidance counselors.

CATEGORIES

  • 401k Plans
  • Business
  • College
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Estate Plans
  • Financial Planning
  • Investing
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Legal
  • Market Analysis
  • Markets
  • Medicare
  • Money
  • Personal Finance
  • Social Security
  • Startups
  • Stock Market
  • Trading

LATEST UPDATES

  • Binance Responds to Charges of Supporting Trump-Family Crypto USD1 and WLFI Soon After CZ Pardon
  • Guardant Health raises 2025 revenue outlook to $970M with Shield partnerships and strong oncology growth (NASDAQ:GH)
  • Bitcoin, Ethereum dip after Fed chair hints that 25-point rate cut may be last of 2025
  • Our Great Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use, Legal Notices & Disclosures
  • Contact us
  • About Us

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.