Our latest US Tech Forecast 2026: What It Means For Government report projects that technology spending for the entire US government sector, including staff costs, will reach $357 billion in 2026, up from $343 billion in 2025, representing 4% year-over-year growth. Government technology will account for 12.3% of total US tech spending of $2.9 trillion in 2026.
This modest growth arrives at a moment of profound technological realignment. Political preferences matter far less than the structural forces now hitting the public sector at speed. We have been here before: Reinvention efforts during the Clinton-Gore era dragged federal procurement into the modern age. Then the Technology Modernization Fund and FITARA pushed business, mission, and technology leaders in federal agencies to rethink accountability, governance, and technical debt. Each shift redefined how government viewed technology’s role in mission delivery, first in Washington and then at the state and local levels.
But today’s context is more demanding. The United States is locked in a global race to capture AI advantage, and public expectations for government performance, resilience, and trust rise in parallel with accelerating private-sector capabilities. Although it’s the same dynamic as the digital business era, the implications for government tech decision-making are more immediate and far-reaching.
In our new report, we highlight three forces that define how the world’s largest public-sector technology market will evolve over the coming year and beyond.
AI Is Becoming The Central Organizing Force In Government Tech Strategy
AI is no longer another item on an innovation roadmap. It is becoming the organizing principle behind investment decisions, operating models, and oversight structures.
Agencies are consolidating fragmented data estates — a prerequisite for training, validating, and governing models responsibly. Benefits, public safety, and permitting agencies are beginning to pilot agentic systems that support caseworkers and analysts, signaling a move from incremental automation to genuine capability uplift.
Spending patterns reflect this shift. Cloud foundations, analytics platforms, API management, and AI governance tooling show steady growth, while traditional enterprise software categories flatten. The throughline is clear: AI readiness is future service delivery readiness, and agencies that modernized early will break away from those still stuck in brittle, siloed architectures.
To guide safe adoption, agencies will increasingly turn to responsible and explainable AI practices and frameworks like Forrester’s AEGIS for securing agentic AI architectures.
Legacy Complexity Collides With AI-Driven Modernization Pressure
Government systems carry decades of technical sediment — entitlement engines, licensing systems, revenue platforms — running on architectures never designed for real-time data flows or AI workloads.
Now AI is forcing agencies to confront what they once deferred. Large federal departments are launching modernization programs once considered too risky or too costly. State and local governments are adopting coexistence strategies to stabilize the old while progressively building the new.
Oversight bodies are raising expectations: “Show us your data lineage,” “demonstrate model assurance,” “prove your resilience posture.” These demands echo the lessons from incidents like Michigan’s AI-driven unemployment fraud scandal, where an automated system wrongly accused 40,000 claimants of fraud. This is modernization under pressure — uneven, often painful, but unavoidable. Agencies that recognize this as a strategic inflection point, not an episodic upgrade cycle, will create the conditions for durable transformation.
Government Spending Shifts From Tools To Integrated Capability Ecosystems
The era of standalone point solutions is ending. Agencies want integrated capability stacks that reduce complexity and deliver measurable mission outcomes.
This is accelerating investment in cloud infrastructure, data platforms, cybersecurity resilience layers, and agentic AI orchestration. Appetite for bespoke or siloed systems is shrinking.
This shift aligns with the “Buy American” emphasis in the President’s Management Agenda, where supply chain provenance, software bill of materials transparency, and domestic hosting now shape procurement. Vendors with US-based cloud regions or verifiable sourcing will see increased opportunity, particularly in federal and defense-adjacent markets.
Cross-boundary ecosystems are already emerging in public safety, health, and benefits delivery, where interoperability, composability, and trust matter more than feature lists. Examples include the USAi secure generative AI evaluation environment launched by the General Services Administration and multiagency customer experience and employee experience initiatives, such as Miami-Dade County’s AI-enabled service modernization.
The winners will be those who help government simplify complexity, accelerate assurance, and deliver mission impact — not those who merely ship software. And many of these winners may not be the traditional software vendors, as core civilian and defense missions increasingly align under growing geopolitical risk.
What This Means For Government Leaders And Vendors
Government leaders must move past incremental pilots and build the foundations for durable transformation: unified data estates, modern engineering practices, strong governance, responsible AI oversight, and resilient architectures. Vendors must prove integration readiness, supply chain resilience, and a credible AI governance story.
Legislators are already raising the bar. New York’s RAISE Act and California’s Transparency in Frontier AI Act are creating new expectations for model assurance, transparency, and safety.
Our forecast provides the numbers. This moment provides the urgency.
Next Steps For Clients
Clients can access the report here and register for our webinar on the government tech spending outlook.
Clients can also contact us for guidance on how to adapt their technology strategy, strengthen AI governance, prioritize modernization investments, or align vendor capabilities to emerging government requirements.
