No Result
View All Result
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLES
  • Login
Friday, October 31, 2025
TheAdviserMagazine.com
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
No Result
View All Result
TheAdviserMagazine.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Market Research Economy

Why Hayek Rejected “Mere Legality”

by TheAdviserMagazine
4 months ago
in Economy
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
Why Hayek Rejected “Mere Legality”
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LInkedIn


In The Constitution of Liberty, Friedrich Hayek argued that “mere legality in all government action” does not suffice as a basis for upholding the rule of law. Under a standard of mere legality, as long as a law is on the statute books, anything done in accordance with that law is legal. Mere legality also implies that as long as there is a plausible way of spinning state actions to bring them within the wording of a statute, that should suffice to make it legal. This would enable tyrants to read anything they want into the law, giving them a plausible foundation to depict all their actions as perfectly legal. Hayek warned that this would turn the law itself into a threat to individual liberty, which in his view would undermine the very purpose of the law. He agreed with John Locke that the purpose of law should be “to preserve and enlarge freedom.” Far from the law preserving liberty, such a standard of mere legality would lead to the abolition of liberty.

Examples of such “legal” tyranny abound. One historical example is Abraham Lincoln suspending habeas corpus and having the Maryland legislature arrested for opposing his war against the South. He took great pains to depict his actions as entirely legal:

Lincoln argued that the Constitution was silent as to whether the President or Congress possessed the power to suspend the writ; and since Congress was not in session, the President could make such a decision lawfully. Moreover, even if the power belonged to Congress, he argued that his responsibility to “take care that the laws be faithfully executed” justified his actions…

Even while Lincoln was preparing his message to Congress, his suspension of the writ in Maryland was having an immediate impact. Union troops flooded into Maryland and seized control of Annapolis and Baltimore. Arrested and imprisoned at Fort McHenry were Baltimore Mayor George P. Brown, the entire city council, Marshal of Police George P. Kane, and all the police commissioners as well as U.S. Congressman Henry May. In September, military officials arrested at least 30 members of the legislature who were deemed to be sympathetic to the South.

David Gordon observes that, far from these tyrannical actions being criticized, Lincoln still enjoys the fulsome praise of his political admirers who believe that as long as the goal is worthy and admirable the President has legal authority to tear up the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus:

It should come as no surprise that neocons and Straussians like what Lincoln did to the Constitution. The neocon historian Allen Guelzo has argued that the Constitution in fact authorizes the president, not Congress, to suspend the writ, and that Lincoln would have been justified in establishing a complete military dictatorship during the War Between the States, continuing though Reconstruction. The leading Straussian Harvey Mansfield also claims in his book “Taming the Prince” that the president, using John Locke’s “prerogative power,” may suspend the writ. The fact that the “prerogative power” isn’t mentioned in the Constitution apparently isn’t relevant.

If one supposes that the Constitution is just a set of plain words which can be given any meaning one prefers, then one could argue that a construction of constitutional power such as that offered by the neocons is “legal.” In the absence of any specific intent or purpose, the plain words of the text could indeed mean almost anything one desired. A recent example is the United States Supreme Court decision in United States v. Skrmetti, where the dissenting judges interpreted the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection clause to mean that parents have a right to give puberty blockers to their children and put their children through irreversible surgery to change their gender. Justice Sotomayor, dissenting from the majority in that case, declared that, “Hormones and puberty blockers help align transgender adolescents’ physical appearance with their gender identity.” As she sees it, parents’ right to do this to their children is protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

On the progressive reading, all the equal protection clause means is that people should be free to do whatever they want as long as it is consistent with progressive values. The notion that the Fourteenth Amendment is concerned with allowing parents to medically transition their boys into girls should strike people as preposterous, but it does not—it has become normal to interpret the law through a progressivist lens. Without any sense of the purpose of a constitutional provision, or the meaning intended by those who framed it, one could argue that a constitution permits anything that can plausibly be twisted to fit within the words of the document. This is precisely what progressive courts do, and explains why the liberal justices on the Supreme Court often come up with almost unrecognizable interpretations of the Constitution.

In his Disquisition on Government, John C. Calhoun returned to first principles in establishing the foundations and purpose of a constitution. As Calhoun saw it, the purpose of a constitution is to prevent—or at least restrain as far as possible—abuse of power by the government. Hayek also highlights the role of a constitution in limiting state power. He therefore distinguishes between what is merely legal, in a technical sense, and the rule of law as a constitutional principle which limits the power of the state to take action that undermines liberty:

[The rule of law] is a doctrine concerning what the law ought to be, concerning the general attributes that particular laws should possess. This is important because today the conception of the rule of law is sometimes confused with the requirement of mere legality in all government action. The rule of law, of course, presupposes complete legality, but this is not enough: if a law gave the government unlimited power to act as it pleased, all its actions would be legal, but it would certainly not be under the rule of law.

Hayek saw the rule of law as “a rule concerning what the law ought to be, a meta-legal doctrine or a political ideal.” The rule of law, in that sense, signifies an ideal requiring the protection of individual liberty—safeguarding the right to life, liberty and property.



Source link

Tags: HayekLegalitymereRejected
ShareTweetShare
Previous Post

Surprise Win: Why Slot Players Might Pay Less Tax This Year

Next Post

Pelephone offers NIS 2b to buy Hot Mobile

Related Posts

edit post
Market Talk – October 30, 2025

Market Talk – October 30, 2025

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 30, 2025
0

ASIA: The major Asian stock markets had a mixed day today: • NIKKEI 225 increased 17.96 points or 0.04% to...

edit post
Trump cuts fentanyl tariffs on China to 10% as Beijing delays rare earth curbs

Trump cuts fentanyl tariffs on China to 10% as Beijing delays rare earth curbs

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 30, 2025
0

BUSAN, SOUTH KOREA - OCTOBER 30: U.S. President Donald Trump (R) speaks with Chinese President Xi Jinping during a bilateral...

edit post
Sudan War: Gold, a Key Port, and Two Armies With No Legitimate Claim

Sudan War: Gold, a Key Port, and Two Armies With No Legitimate Claim

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 30, 2025
0

The Rapid Support Forces (RSF), one of Sudan’s warring parties, have taken over El Fasher, a city in Darfur, western...

edit post
ECB October 2025 rate decision

ECB October 2025 rate decision

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 30, 2025
0

The European Central Bank has kept interest rates on hold, as expected, at its latest meeting on Thursday.The central bank...

edit post
By All Means, Elect Mamdani and Watch His Socialist Laboratory at Work

By All Means, Elect Mamdani and Watch His Socialist Laboratory at Work

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 30, 2025
0

Next week, New York City voters almost surely will send self-proclaimed socialist Zohran Mamdani to Gracie Mansion, and he promises...

edit post
The Tragedy of Expatriation: Europe’s Lost Future

The Tragedy of Expatriation: Europe’s Lost Future

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 30, 2025
0

A recent survey has caused quite a stir in France, highlighting a new reality facing a changing Europe: the brain...

Next Post
edit post
Pelephone offers NIS 2b to buy Hot Mobile

Pelephone offers NIS 2b to buy Hot Mobile

edit post
Coffee Break: Armed Madhouse – AI Goes to War

Coffee Break: Armed Madhouse - AI Goes to War

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
edit post
77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

October 18, 2025
edit post
Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

October 7, 2025
edit post
What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

October 8, 2025
edit post
Another Violent Outburst – Democrats Inciting Civil Unrest

Another Violent Outburst – Democrats Inciting Civil Unrest

October 24, 2025
edit post
Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

October 17, 2025
edit post
California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In 2M Ponzi Scheme

California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In $912M Ponzi Scheme

October 15, 2025
edit post
Book Review: Resistance Money: A Philosophical Case for Bitcoin

Book Review: Resistance Money: A Philosophical Case for Bitcoin

0
edit post
ECB October 2025 rate decision

ECB October 2025 rate decision

0
edit post
Goldman Sachs survey says only 11% of companies are actively linking layoffs to AI—but the real shock is yet to come

Goldman Sachs survey says only 11% of companies are actively linking layoffs to AI—but the real shock is yet to come

0
edit post
Has Mastercard accepted the inevitability of crypto? Spends B on tokenization platform

Has Mastercard accepted the inevitability of crypto? Spends $2B on tokenization platform

0
edit post
How to protect your bank account

How to protect your bank account

0
edit post
The 2026 Social Security Bump Will Cost Some Retirees. Are Your Benefits at Risk of Taxation?

The 2026 Social Security Bump Will Cost Some Retirees. Are Your Benefits at Risk of Taxation?

0
edit post
How to protect your bank account

How to protect your bank account

October 31, 2025
edit post
Getting Started: Inventory Types and Conditions

Getting Started: Inventory Types and Conditions

October 31, 2025
edit post
Biogen outlines 67% launch product growth and signals expanded pipeline momentum amid strong Q3 results (NASDAQ:BIIB)

Biogen outlines 67% launch product growth and signals expanded pipeline momentum amid strong Q3 results (NASDAQ:BIIB)

October 30, 2025
edit post
Asian shares rise: Asian shares, US futures rise on tech results, gold holds gain

Asian shares rise: Asian shares, US futures rise on tech results, gold holds gain

October 30, 2025
edit post
XRP Could Drive the ‘Biggest Economic Shift’ in Decades: Crypto Expert

XRP Could Drive the ‘Biggest Economic Shift’ in Decades: Crypto Expert

October 30, 2025
edit post
Has Mastercard accepted the inevitability of crypto? Spends B on tokenization platform

Has Mastercard accepted the inevitability of crypto? Spends $2B on tokenization platform

October 30, 2025
The Adviser Magazine

The first and only national digital and print magazine that connects individuals, families, and businesses to Fee-Only financial advisers, accountants, attorneys and college guidance counselors.

CATEGORIES

  • 401k Plans
  • Business
  • College
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Estate Plans
  • Financial Planning
  • Investing
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Legal
  • Market Analysis
  • Markets
  • Medicare
  • Money
  • Personal Finance
  • Social Security
  • Startups
  • Stock Market
  • Trading

LATEST UPDATES

  • How to protect your bank account
  • Getting Started: Inventory Types and Conditions
  • Biogen outlines 67% launch product growth and signals expanded pipeline momentum amid strong Q3 results (NASDAQ:BIIB)
  • Our Great Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use, Legal Notices & Disclosures
  • Contact us
  • About Us

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.