No Result
View All Result
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLES
  • Login
Tuesday, October 21, 2025
TheAdviserMagazine.com
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
No Result
View All Result
TheAdviserMagazine.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Market Research Economy

Seattle’s Other Monorail: Some Lessons for California

by TheAdviserMagazine
5 months ago
in Economy
Reading Time: 6 mins read
A A
Seattle’s Other Monorail: Some Lessons for California
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LInkedIn


Economists have two favorite expressions: First, the phrase “Sunk costs are sunk costs” means that costs expended thus far are water over the dam and should not themselves constitute a rationale to proceed with an effort that may have had persistent cost overruns or delays with no clear end in sight. Second, “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch,” is self-explanatory and known by its acronym TANSTAAFL. This means that every action incurs some opportunity cost and someone will pay for it even as it may appear to be “free” to others.

Both of these principles apply to the California bullet train—originally authorized by voters in 2008—struggling for several years with its first 171-mile segment between Merced and Bakersfield in the state’s Central Valley, ultimately destined to become one segment of a longer bullet train route from San Francisco to Los Angeles.

About $14 billion has been spent on this phase of the bullet train project—82 percent of that from the state and the remaining 18 percent from federal grants. Reports reveal a $7 billion funding gap for completion of the Merced-Bakersfield segment by 2033. The US Transportation Department is investigating and a bill in Congress could entirely end further federal funding for the project.

William Anderson—Mises Senior Editor—has recently written about this California bullet-train fiasco here and here. He has also spoken about this with Ryan McMaken on the Radio Rothbard podcast.

How One US City Managed to Avoid Such a Sunk-Cost Disaster

Seattle, Washington is a city of half a million residents in a metropolitan area of over three million, with some of the nation’s worst gridlock traffic. Before some unexpected hiccups occurred along the way, Seattle nearly became another victim of an elevated rail project.

Note that this derailed Seattle monorail project is not the original 1962 world’s fair monorail, which still runs successfully under private management, charging above-market fares to ride the short distance from downtown to Seattle Center, about a 15-minute walk. This original monorail is a novel tourist attraction that cannot be considered serious urban rail transit, nor was it ever intended to be.

I lived in Seattle during the period of the ill-fated newer monorail project—1997-2008—as well as some years both before and afterward. After its original voter passage, I circulated petitions asking the city for ballot opportunities to cancel the project, spoke at city council meetings, wrote letters to local newspaper editors, and discussed it regularly with other Seattleites.

It was difficult to dissuade Seattleites from their romantic image of urban trains running above street level. The new monorail project, moreover, had competition in the form of a more ambitious light rail project, to be called Sound Transit. This project had been proposed at the same time in the mid-1990s, competing for voter support and funding sources.

This Sound Transit light rail project was better-funded than the monorail project and more politically viable because its routes would cover the entire Seattle metropolitan region rather than only the city itself. Its tracks would run both above traffic and underground. While city officials publicly supported both the monorail and light rail projects, their enthusiasm for light rail appeared greater. Its service began in 2009 between downtown and SeaTax airport.

Seattle’s Sound Transit light rail system is today deemed a success, adequately funded by car license fees, property tax, sales tax, rental car sales tax—and several handsome federal construction grants over the years.

The Story of the Ill-Fated Seattle Monorail Project

Here is the backstory of the Seattle monorail project based on my notes and memory of those days. Additional detail is available on Wikipedia, and the History Link.

What is now called the “Seattle monorail project”—to distinguish it from the 1962 world’s fair monorail—was a contentious political issue in Seattle from 1997 to 2005. After sufficient petition signatures qualified the project for the ballot in 1997, voters passed it 53 percent to 47 percent. The initiative proposed a 54-mile X-shaped monorail system connected to and extending the original 1962 monorail. The voter initiative created a new agency—the Elevated Transportation Corporation (ETC) using private funding.

When the ETC determined that private money could not build a monorail system without public funds, a second monorail referendum went on the ballot in 2000. It passed 56 percent to 44 percent, allowing $6 million for additional studies to design an improved plan with full cost estimates and funding for construction.

The ETC developed a plan that was now officially named the Seattle Monorail Project (the Project), which would dissolve the ETC, create a new monorail agency, and enact an annual 1.4 percent excise tax on motor vehicles registered in Seattle. This referendum passed in 2002 by 877 votes—50.2 percent to 49.7 percent. Construction was scheduled to begin in fall 2005 and be completed in 2009.

The annual vehicle excise tax began in June 2003. The average annual monorail tax per vehicle was $130. Yet the actual revenue from the tax came in 30 percent under projections while projected costs rose by 10 percent.

Just a year later, in 2004, a recall initiative went on the ballot seeking to halt the entire project by forcing the city to deny the Project the right to use the air space above public city streets. This fourth voter initiative in seven years lost 64 percent to 36 percent, prolonging the Project.

But the situation became worse following these four trips to the ballot box. The Project next proposed extending the tax and bond repayments over a 50-year time frame, which would result in about $9 billion in interest paid on the $2 billion construction cost. At the same time, the Washington state Treasurer announced that the state’s investment-grade bond rating could not be considered an endorsement of the Project’s bond issuance, leaving those bonds rated junk-grade.

The Seattle Monorail Project’s Denouement

At the news of a junk rating for the Project bonds, Seattle mayor Greg Nichols issued an ultimatum to create a new financial plan or lose city support. He had supported the four previous ballot issues, but now called for a measure on the November 2005 ballot to determine whether to continue the Project, the fifth time voters were asked to opine. When this fifth vote failed—65 percent to 35 percent—the Project reduced staff, terminated the annual motor vehicle excise tax, and began to sell properties already purchased for the proposed system construction.

The Seattle Monorail Authority was formally dissolved in January 2008 after liquidating all its assets, repaying its debt, and transferring its remaining cash balance to the county-run bus system. The failed monorail project ultimately cost Seattle taxpayers $124.7 million in taxes, costs of five ballot efforts, and miscellaneous expenses.

Thus was Seattle saved from becoming the victim of an ill-fated urban rail project because of a few individuals who stepped forward: a state Treasurer who refused to lend the state’s investment-grade rating to bonds issued by the teetering monorail project, a city mayor who finally determined that he could no longer support the project, and savvy voters who took their cues from these elected officials and nixed the project after four previous sustaining votes.

What about the Fate of the California Bullet Train?

One can only wonder how the Seattle Monorail Project managed to remain alive as long as it did—1997 through 2008. Are there sufficient similarities between this Project and California’s bullet train to provide clues to handle the struggling bullet train?

There comes a time when allocating resources to a failing project incurs significant opportunity costs, since those resources could be allocated to some of California’s other major problems—homelessness, crime rates, budget deficits, high taxes and cost of living. This should remind Californians of the important economic principle that there’s no free lunch, that everyone pays for the misallocated resources.

Though most Californians are presumably aware of the bullet train boondoggle, one senses that California’s deep-blue residents who vote as a monolithic block would have neither the will nor energy to endure the lengthy process of petitioning for an initiative on the ballot that could halt the project. Seattle voters, on the other hand, were a less monolithic deep-blue wall during the Monorail Project’s failure, though they have helplessly shifted further leftward recently.

To halt a large, failing, sunk-cost project like a monorail or bullet train requires strong leaders who can convince voters when it is time to cancel a project despite claims that doing so wastes the sunk costs. Both Seattle and California voters today share a tendency to continue voting for the same politicians who have previously mismanaged their respective states.

One can foresee a future time when the California bullet train’s concrete pylons—once intended to support train tracks in the Central Valley—may someday be unearthed by archeologists who will wonder what the project was intended for and what happened to it.

Editor’s Note: Jane L. Johnson, who had become popular with many of our readers, recently passed away. We will miss her intelligent copy and the many lively emails she sent to the editors. Rest in peace.



Source link

Tags: CaliforniaLessonsMonorailSeattles
ShareTweetShare
Previous Post

Fed can be patient, ready to respond if needed: Logan

Next Post

Chime chases $11 billion valuation in IPO set for next week on Nasdaq

Related Posts

edit post
This week’s critical inflation report comes with doubts about the data

This week’s critical inflation report comes with doubts about the data

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 21, 2025
0

Customers check out at a supermarket on August 12, 2025 in New York City. Liao Pan | China News Service...

edit post
How Progressives Broke the Constitution and Praised Themselves for It

How Progressives Broke the Constitution and Praised Themselves for It

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 21, 2025
0

In his article “Is the Constitution Broken beyond Repair?” David Gordon draws attention to a phenomenon that is often overlooked,...

edit post
On Fair Prices – Econlib

On Fair Prices – Econlib

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 21, 2025
0

Discussions on what constitutes a “fair” (or just) price are quite old.  Classical market liberals will typically classify a fair...

edit post
Links 10/21/2025 | naked capitalism

Links 10/21/2025 | naked capitalism

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 21, 2025
0

Dogs protect us if we go to Hell. That’s why we worship them The Times Where do your pumpkins come...

edit post
The Countdown Is On: One Month Until The 2025 World Economic Conference

The Countdown Is On: One Month Until The 2025 World Economic Conference

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 21, 2025
0

We’re officially one month away from the 2025 World Economic Conference — the most anticipated economic event of the year!...

edit post
Market Talk – October 20, 2025

Market Talk – October 20, 2025

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 20, 2025
0

ASIA: The major Asian stock markets had a green day today: • NIKKEI 225 increased 1,603.35 points or 3.37% to...

Next Post
edit post
Chime chases  billion valuation in IPO set for next week on Nasdaq

Chime chases $11 billion valuation in IPO set for next week on Nasdaq

edit post
Don’t pay any interest until 2026

Don't pay any interest until 2026

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
edit post
77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

October 18, 2025
edit post
Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

October 7, 2025
edit post
What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

October 8, 2025
edit post
Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

October 17, 2025
edit post
California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In 2M Ponzi Scheme

California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In $912M Ponzi Scheme

October 15, 2025
edit post
Baby Boomers Are Flocking to This Florida Town — but Not for the Weather

Baby Boomers Are Flocking to This Florida Town — but Not for the Weather

October 9, 2025
edit post
Gov’t mulls subsidizing Israel – Argentina flights

Gov’t mulls subsidizing Israel – Argentina flights

0
edit post
Planet Labs PBC (PL) Rallied on Improved Investor Sentiment

Planet Labs PBC (PL) Rallied on Improved Investor Sentiment

0
edit post
Travis Kelce joins activist investor Jana Partners in push to revive Six Flags

Travis Kelce joins activist investor Jana Partners in push to revive Six Flags

0
edit post
Central Asia’s biggest state continues to push political reforms

Central Asia’s biggest state continues to push political reforms

0
edit post
10 High Dividend Stocks Trading Near 52 Week Lows

10 High Dividend Stocks Trading Near 52 Week Lows

0
edit post
This week’s critical inflation report comes with doubts about the data

This week’s critical inflation report comes with doubts about the data

0
edit post
Elon Musk Reignites Floki Frenzy, Can FLOKI Hold Gains as Crypto Market Falls 3%?

Elon Musk Reignites Floki Frenzy, Can FLOKI Hold Gains as Crypto Market Falls 3%?

October 21, 2025
edit post
Dynasty initiative vets indie options for wirehouse teams

Dynasty initiative vets indie options for wirehouse teams

October 21, 2025
edit post
AgNC outlines stable leverage strategy and sees 10.6% economic return as Fed signals rate cuts (NASDAQ:AGNC)

AgNC outlines stable leverage strategy and sees 10.6% economic return as Fed signals rate cuts (NASDAQ:AGNC)

October 21, 2025
edit post
This week’s critical inflation report comes with doubts about the data

This week’s critical inflation report comes with doubts about the data

October 21, 2025
edit post
10 High Dividend Stocks Trading Near 52 Week Lows

10 High Dividend Stocks Trading Near 52 Week Lows

October 21, 2025
edit post
Travis Kelce joins activist investor Jana Partners in push to revive Six Flags

Travis Kelce joins activist investor Jana Partners in push to revive Six Flags

October 21, 2025
The Adviser Magazine

The first and only national digital and print magazine that connects individuals, families, and businesses to Fee-Only financial advisers, accountants, attorneys and college guidance counselors.

CATEGORIES

  • 401k Plans
  • Business
  • College
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Estate Plans
  • Financial Planning
  • Investing
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Legal
  • Market Analysis
  • Markets
  • Medicare
  • Money
  • Personal Finance
  • Social Security
  • Startups
  • Stock Market
  • Trading

LATEST UPDATES

  • Elon Musk Reignites Floki Frenzy, Can FLOKI Hold Gains as Crypto Market Falls 3%?
  • Dynasty initiative vets indie options for wirehouse teams
  • AgNC outlines stable leverage strategy and sees 10.6% economic return as Fed signals rate cuts (NASDAQ:AGNC)
  • Our Great Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use, Legal Notices & Disclosures
  • Contact us
  • About Us

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.