These Neocons are lucky I am not president. I would have each and every one of them arrested and imprisoned for life in a CIA Dark Site with ZERO human rights. Death is way too good for these people. They have brought the world closer to destruction than Khruschev did in 1962 with the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Even the Cuban Missile Crisis plotting the ECM frequency also confirmed 2014 as the start of all of this escalation in war, thanks to the Neocons who insist Russia wants to conquer the world, so they must do it first. General Wesley Clark also encountered this attitude.
During Blinken’s visit to China in April 2024 (April 24–26), reports surfaced that the U.S. considered sanctions targeting Chinese financial institutions—including possible removal from SWIFT—to discourage China’s support for Russia’s defense industry. He did issue a severe, public warning of significant “consequences”—which would include severe financial sanctions—for any country, including China, that provided material support to Russia’s war effort. The implication about SWIFT arose because it was the most powerful financial tool the West had just demonstrated it was willing to use against Russia, making it a logical part of the unstated “consequences” being hinted at. This is what created BRICS – the arrogance of these NEOCONS who think that they can dictate to the world. They screw the world economy as a whole by transforming the dollar into a geopolitical weapon.
Therefore, while the threat of removing China from SWIFT was never explicitly made, it was widely understood as being within the spectrum of potential “consequences” the U.S. was prepared to enact since the NEOCONS took advantage of Biden’s incompetence and usurped American foreign policy. They are outright traders to the country, and this was a coup of American foreign policy. The actual policy tool would more likely be targeted secondary sanctions rather than a complete SWIFT ban, which would have massive disruptive effects on the global economy.
Calling these NEOCONS a piece of shit would be a compliment. There is no word in the English language to describe the depths to which these treasonous characters have usurped the foreign policy of the United States and thus have descended into Dante’s Hell, dragging the world with them. Dante’s Hell was organized into nine concentric circles, each punishing a specific sin. They belong in the worst of the worst – CIRCLE 9:
Circle 9: The Treacherous (Cocytus)
The final circle is a frozen lake, Cocytus, where those who betrayed special relationships are trapped in ice. It is divided into four concentric rounds.
All they think of is killing Russians and using American taxpayers’ wealth to fund their depraved hatreds. All because Russians used to be Communists, and I have heard derogatory remarks about throwing Ukrainians into the meatgrinder, that WTH, they too were Nzis and Communists. Neither the Russian people nor Putin has any desire to return to Communism. The same is true in China and Eastern Europe. The real question is, are these neocons judging others by their own dreams?
Khruschev’s statement “We will Bury You” wasn’t made in a vacuum. The famous phrase was uttered during a speech for Western diplomats at the Polish embassy in Moscow on November 18th, 1956. The context was rather intense at that moment.
Just weeks earlier, the USSR had brutally crushed the anti-communist uprising in Hungary, drawing global condemnation. At the same time, Britain, France, and Israel were attacking Egypt over the Suez Canal, an act seen as “imperialist aggression” by the Soviet bloc.
In this tense atmosphere, Khrushchev was boasting about the Soviet Union’s economic and military strength, particularly its lead in rocket technology (the USSR had just launched Sputnik). The “we will bury you” line was part of a boastful, combative speech meant to project strength and ideological confidence to both a foreign and domestic audience.
Khrushchev was a true believer in the superiority of communism and its ultimate victory. However, his most infamous phrase was a cultural and linguistic misunderstanding. It was not a declaration of war as the Neocons used to boost military confrontation with Russia, but a boastful, ideological prediction of victory through historical forces and economic competition—a prediction that, as we know from history, ultimately proved incorrect.
NATO and the Neocons argue that Putin wants to conquer Europe, applying to him the intentions of Nikita Khruschev (1894-1971), whose motive was the philosophical confrontation that Communism was superior to Capitalism. Putin is not a communist, and the Russian people do not want to return to the days of Stalin. Nevertheless, NATO has no purpose if there is no war. They need to assert that Russia will constantly conquer Europe, so send them money to keep their jobs and pensions flowing.
This is a fundamental concept in social psychology when someone judges another by their actions or desires. A combination of several related biases most accurately explains the phenomenon you’re describing, but the core theory is called the Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE).
The psychological principles that define why these Neocons judge others by our own intentions and desires. For example, if you witness someone snap at a cashier, you are likely to think, “They are such a rude and impatient person” (internal attribution: their character). However, if you snap at a cashier, you are likely to think, “I’m so sorry, I’ve had a terrible, stressful day” (external attribution: the situation). We attribute others’ actions to who they are, but our own actions to what we’re going through. These NEOCONS attribute their own actions to external, situational factors, believing they wear the white hat, but they attribute others’ actions to their internal, stable, or corrupt traits.
Of course, the actions of NATO and the NEOCONS boil down to a fundamental concept in social psychology. The psychological term for attributing our own thoughts, feelings, motives, or intentions to others is projection, which is really a Defense Mechanism. This is a classic Freudian psychoanalytic definition. Projection is a defense mechanism where the ego unconsciously rejects impulses, desires, or feelings that it finds unacceptable or threatening in itself. These Neocons then attribute these exact same traits to another person.
Hence, Putin wants to conquer the world, so they must do it first. They are still under the guise that they will spread democracy to the world to counteract Khruschev’s goal of defeating capitalism by spreading communism. Sorry, those days are gone, but the NEOCONS have not stopped with their insane agenda. They have sought to overthrow the various regimes in the Middle East under this dogma. They are delusional, for we do NOT live in a Democracy. If we had done so, they could never have seized power. That is only possible in a Republic where tyranny flourished among the UNELECTED Deep State that acts in its self-interest – not the American people.
There is also what is called the “False-Consensus Effect” (as a Cognitive Bias). This is similar to the Freudian Projection Defense Mechanism, yet it is a distinct concept. This is a cognitive bias where people overestimate the extent to which their own beliefs, opinions, preferences, and habits are normal and typical of others. You hear that outright stated in Robert McNamara’s apology.
In other words, they assume that most others think and intend to act the same way they do. He states that he acted in what he thought were the goals of the American people when they were just the dogma of the NEOCONS.
