No Result
View All Result
SUBMIT YOUR ARTICLES
  • Login
Tuesday, October 21, 2025
TheAdviserMagazine.com
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal
No Result
View All Result
TheAdviserMagazine.com
No Result
View All Result
Home Legal

The Future of the NLRB, as Constituted, Is in Doubt | Samuel Estreicher | Verdict

by TheAdviserMagazine
4 months ago
in Legal
Reading Time: 4 mins read
A A
The Future of the NLRB, as Constituted, Is in Doubt | Samuel Estreicher | Verdict
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on LInkedIn


The future of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board), the venerable agency that since 1935 has been the exclusive investigation, enforcement, and adjudicatory body under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act), 49 Stat. 449 (1935), is in doubt. Although the subject of over 50 Supreme Court decisions and several thousand federal appeals decisions, the Supreme Court’s relatively new “unitary executive” jurisprudence raises serious questions over whether the President can unilaterally remove members of the Board before their terms have expired and without demonstrating cause for such removal, as defined in the Act.

The constitutionality of a multimember agency like the NLRB was upheld in the Court’s unanimous 1935 decision in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602. In an opinion authored by Justice George Sutherland, one of the conservative “Four Horsemen” on the Court presumably bent on overturning much of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (FDR)’s New Deal agenda, the Court upheld the Federal Trade Commission’s structure (similar to the NLRB) even though the President could not remove FTC Commissioners at will before their term was up. It explained that Congress can create agencies outside the executive departments to enforce federal statutes provided they do not wield “purely executive” powers but, rather, exercise “quasi-judicial” and “quasi-legislative” powers. Though its reasoning may appear a bit opaque to today’s readers, the essence of the Court’s ruling was that the executive power of the United States could be shared between the President and these multimember agencies. For the Humphreys Court, it was ultimately a question of institutional design for Congress to decide in the first instance: statutes lodged with the executive departments would be presumed to be under the control of the President, subject to the substantive provisions of the legislation. Those committed to multimember agencies were somewhat shielded from executive control. Under the Constitution’s Appointments Clause, the President had to appoint the agency heads (i.e., the Commissioners) subject to the Senate’s consent, but he could not remove them without cause during their terms. Over time, Humphrey’s Executor’s reasoning has been extended to the NLRB and many other federal multimember agencies.

This stable jurisprudence first began to unravel with Justice Antonin Scalia’s fiery dissent in Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988), a decision sustaining the constitutionality of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978, 92 Stat. 1824. That law created a special court and independent counsel not subject to the usual executive oversight and removable by the Attorney General only for cause. His dissent reasoned that law enforcement was a purely executive function that could not be shielded from the President’s removal authority implied under Article II’s vesting of the entire executive power in the President. For Justice Scalia, for the President to be able to “faithfully execute” the laws of the United States, as Article II requires, the President had to have the untrammeled authority to remove at will officers of the United States who exercise executive authority.

A further step in the Supreme Court’s recognition of the central importance of an uncabined presidential removal power came in Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion for the Court in Free Enterprise Fund v. PCAOB, 561 U.S. 477 (2010), a case involving the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 116 Stat. 745. The Court ruled that the board members of Sarbanes-Oxley’s Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB)—considered to be “inferior officers” who could be appointed by the agency head or a court of law (rather than the President)—could not constitutionally be shielded from presidential removal when the members of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the agency that supervises the PCAOB, were themselves presumed to be protected from at-will removal. The opinion holds that “such multilevel protection from removal is contrary to Article II’s vesting of the executive power in the President.”

A third step was in Seila Law, LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, 591 U.S. 197 (2020), another opinion for the Court by Chief Justice Roberts. The Court held that Congress in the Dodd Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank), 124 Stat. 1376 (2010), could not constitutionally create a single-head “independent agency” and immunize that official from at-will removal by the President. Although the opinion extensively discusses the special problems with single-head as opposed to multimember independent agencies, the Court emphasized that it left in place “two exceptions to the President’s unrestricted removal power.” One exception was for “inferior officers” of the United States “with limited duties and no policymaking or administrative authority….” The other for “multimember executive agencies that do not wield substantial executive power….” These exceptions, the Court noted quoting then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s dissenting opinion in the D.C. Circuit’s opinion in the Free Enterprise Fund litigation, 881 F.3d 75 (2018), “represent what up to now have been the outermost constitutional limits of permissible congressional restrictions on the President’s removal power.”

Those who recognize the importance of the NLRA to our economy and system of industrial justice might hope concerns that overruling or substantially limiting Humphrey’s Executor might place in doubt the continued viability of the Federal Reserve Board, whose members are also shielded from at-will removal by the President, would prompt the Court to continue to adhere to Humphrey’s in full or rule that the Board does not exercise “substantial executive power”. Those hopes have been dashed in substantial part by the Court’s decision in Trump v. Wilcox, No. A24A966 (May 22, 2025), staying a lower court ruling requiring the reinstatement of a member of the NLRB and a member of the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), a multimember body that handles federal employee disputes. The Court explained that “[t]he stay reflects our judgment that the Government is likely to show that both the NLRB and the MSPB exercise considerable executive power.” The Court made clear, however, that it was not deciding on an application for a stay whether either agency falls within a “recognized exception” from unrestricted presidential removal authority under Seila Law and Free Enterprise Fund.

The Board’s future, as presently constituted, will be decided at the earliest in the Supreme Court’s 2025-2026 Term. It is possible the Court might limit the impact of its ruling by severing from both agencies their law enforcement, as opposed to adjudicatory, powers—in the Board’s case, its authority to issue regulations, to approve applications to seek Section 10(j) injunctions in court, and to supervise the regional offices in Representation cases. Perhaps, in this manner, the NLRB can survive a post-Humphrey’s Executor world. The more likely course would be to encourage Congress to reconstruct the NLRB as a purely adjudicatory body along the lines suggested in Samuel Estreicher, G. Roger King & David S. Sherwyn, Labor Board Needs Restructuring, Not Destruction, The Regulatory Review, May 27, 2025.



Source link

Tags: ConstitutedDoubtEstreicherfutureNLRBSamuelVerdict
ShareTweetShare
Previous Post

The Mysterious Disappearance of Dia Abrams and What It Teaches Us About Careful Estate Planning

Next Post

Trump says Iran has ‘maximum’ two weeks to avoid US air strikes, dismisses Europe peace efforts

Related Posts

edit post
Chicago Woman Indicted Despite Claims She Was Shot by a Federal Agent

Chicago Woman Indicted Despite Claims She Was Shot by a Federal Agent

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 17, 2025
0

Marimar Martinez was charged on October 5, 2025, with assaulting a federal officer with a deadly or dangerous weapon after...

edit post
Highlights from ClioCon 2025 | Clio

Highlights from ClioCon 2025 | Clio

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 17, 2025
0

18 minutes read Published Oct 17, 2025 ClioCon 2025 showcased the future of legal technology, unveiling transformative innovations designed to...

edit post
The Four Shields That Endanger Children | Kathryn Robb | Verdict

The Four Shields That Endanger Children | Kathryn Robb | Verdict

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 17, 2025
0

Child sexual abuse is not rare. It is an epidemic. One in four girls and one in thirteen boys will...

edit post
Repeated “Nonexistent Cases” in Filing From >20-Lawyer Insurance Defense Firm

Repeated “Nonexistent Cases” in Filing From >20-Lawyer Insurance Defense Firm

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 16, 2025
0

From today's decision in Gittemeier v. Liberty Mutual Pers. Ins. Co. (E.D. Mo.): Gittemeier posits that Liberty Mutual again miscited...

edit post
California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In 2M Ponzi Scheme

California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In $912M Ponzi Scheme

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 15, 2025
0

Rule of thumb: you should never represent your client in a way that will make you need a lawyer down...

edit post
On LawNext: How AI Is Helping Legal Aid Serve 50% More Clients: Thomson Reuters’ AI for Justice Program One Year In

On LawNext: How AI Is Helping Legal Aid Serve 50% More Clients: Thomson Reuters’ AI for Justice Program One Year In

by TheAdviserMagazine
October 15, 2025
0

In the United States, over 90% of civil legal needs go unrepresented – a staggering justice gap that leaves millions...

Next Post
edit post
Trump says Iran has ‘maximum’ two weeks to avoid US air strikes, dismisses Europe peace efforts

Trump says Iran has 'maximum' two weeks to avoid US air strikes, dismisses Europe peace efforts

edit post
CoinMarketCap’s front-end compromised, investigation underway

CoinMarketCap's front-end compromised, investigation underway

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
edit post
77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

77-year-old popular furniture retailer closes store locations

October 18, 2025
edit post
Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

Pennsylvania House of Representatives Rejects Update to Child Custody Laws

October 7, 2025
edit post
What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

What to Do When a Loved One Dies in North Carolina

October 8, 2025
edit post
Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

Probate vs. Non-Probate Assets: What’s the Difference?

October 17, 2025
edit post
California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In 2M Ponzi Scheme

California Attorney Pleads Guilty For Role In $912M Ponzi Scheme

October 15, 2025
edit post
Baby Boomers Are Flocking to This Florida Town — but Not for the Weather

Baby Boomers Are Flocking to This Florida Town — but Not for the Weather

October 9, 2025
edit post
Nikkei extends record rally as Japan makes history with first female PM

Nikkei extends record rally as Japan makes history with first female PM

0
edit post
40% of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable but their stock outperforms—and ‘the bubble could continue,’ one analyst says

40% of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable but their stock outperforms—and ‘the bubble could continue,’ one analyst says

0
edit post
7 New Car Models That Just Got Cheaper

7 New Car Models That Just Got Cheaper

0
edit post
The Missing Pieces in Real Estate Tax Strategy

The Missing Pieces in Real Estate Tax Strategy

0
edit post
On Fair Prices – Econlib

On Fair Prices – Econlib

0
edit post
Housing market seen remaining slow

Housing market seen remaining slow

0
edit post
40% of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable but their stock outperforms—and ‘the bubble could continue,’ one analyst says

40% of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable but their stock outperforms—and ‘the bubble could continue,’ one analyst says

October 21, 2025
edit post
7 New Car Models That Just Got Cheaper

7 New Car Models That Just Got Cheaper

October 21, 2025
edit post
Nikkei extends record rally as Japan makes history with first female PM

Nikkei extends record rally as Japan makes history with first female PM

October 21, 2025
edit post
On Fair Prices – Econlib

On Fair Prices – Econlib

October 21, 2025
edit post
Protagonist Therapeutics – PTGX: Einstieg von Johnson & Johnson könnte für Mega-Bounce sorgen!

Protagonist Therapeutics – PTGX: Einstieg von Johnson & Johnson könnte für Mega-Bounce sorgen!

October 21, 2025
edit post
Episode 231. “Our 0k in crypto is gone. Now we live with his mom.”

Episode 231. “Our $200k in crypto is gone. Now we live with his mom.”

October 21, 2025
The Adviser Magazine

The first and only national digital and print magazine that connects individuals, families, and businesses to Fee-Only financial advisers, accountants, attorneys and college guidance counselors.

CATEGORIES

  • 401k Plans
  • Business
  • College
  • Cryptocurrency
  • Economy
  • Estate Plans
  • Financial Planning
  • Investing
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Legal
  • Market Analysis
  • Markets
  • Medicare
  • Money
  • Personal Finance
  • Social Security
  • Startups
  • Stock Market
  • Trading

LATEST UPDATES

  • 40% of Russell 2000 companies are unprofitable but their stock outperforms—and ‘the bubble could continue,’ one analyst says
  • 7 New Car Models That Just Got Cheaper
  • Nikkei extends record rally as Japan makes history with first female PM
  • Our Great Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use, Legal Notices & Disclosures
  • Contact us
  • About Us

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • Financial Planning
    • Financial Planning
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Research
    • Business
    • Investing
    • Money
    • Economy
    • Markets
    • Stocks
    • Trading
  • 401k Plans
  • College
  • IRS & Taxes
  • Estate Plans
  • Social Security
  • Medicare
  • Legal

© Copyright 2024 All Rights Reserved
See articles for original source and related links to external sites.